Rebirth of the Almighty Internet Celebrity

Chapter 344 Family Trivia



Chapter 344 Family Trivia

Chapter 344 Family Trivia

Although "the youngest daughter of the Zhou family" can find a lot of counterexamples to prove that "it's really nothing special to have a son"! ! !

But how many "cases" can be found?

Still can't get rid of the deep-rooted traditional concept of the old people: they just think that having an extra male is better than having an extra female baby!

It's not that they don't value their "granddaughter".As long as it is one's own flesh and blood, it is relatively precious.But relatively speaking, if it is a "grandson", it is even more precious.This is a relative question.

This is how the older generation thinks.Impossible to change.

Not to mention that the old people are like this, wouldn't it be the couple who were the "little daughter of the Zhou family" who were still working tirelessly to get a "son"?

No matter what excuse "I already have three daughters before I want a son" is used, the couple just want a son anyway.This fact will not change.

Even the "little daughter of the Zhou family" can't completely get rid of this kind of thinking. Can the older generation be expected not to "prefer boys over girls"? !

From the perspective of "the youngest daughter of the Zhou family", she looks like her "nephew", the son of her "sister-in-law", who is not only dirty like a "mud monkey", but also unhygienic like a "garbage dog" .Such a little guy would be extremely embarrassed if he were her son.

However, when it came time for the "little daughter of the Zhou family" that her own child didn't pay attention to hygiene, she didn't have such a big reaction.

For example, her third daughter, who is more than 3 years old this year, has already been sent to "kindergarten".However, this third daughter is far less obedient than the previous two "sisters".When I was in the "kindergarten", the teacher reported that the child often lied to the teacher and said "I want to go out and pee", and when he left the classroom, he actually went to the playground to play.

Instead of going to "kindergarten" on weekends, I play at home.The third daughter also always urinates whenever she wants to be small, and she can urinate whenever she wants to be big... Anyway, there are many "five grains of reincarnation" left by the little guy in the yard.

At this time, the "little daughter of the Zhou family" didn't see her despise her third daughter as much as she despised the children of the "sister-in-law" family?

So, other people's children are other people's children, and if something is not pleasing to the eye, the more it is, the more it is not pleasing to the eye.As for my own children, it is more about "tolerance, tolerance, and tolerance".

But "the youngest daughter of the Zhou family" can be regarded as "a fan of the authorities".He just doesn't like the little nephew of the "sister-in-law" family very much.

The "eldest sister-in-law" originally had no conflict with the "little daughter of the Zhou family".But because of the "little son-in-law's work as a frame worker," the "sister-in-law" also became separated from the "sister-in-law."

For example, at the beginning, when the "little daughter of the Zhou family" saw her "sister-in-law" coming home from get off work, she even greeted her "sister-in-law".But this one had a big quarrel with the husband of "the youngest daughter of the Zhou family", and the final face was torn, and the greetings to the "sister-in-law" also adopted a non-responsive "indifference". "manner.

Later, the "little son-in-law builder" completed the decoration of the new house, and also paved the small yard on the left side of the door and in front of his own house.Surrounded by a wall.But at the "gateway" of the entrance, there is no gate installed.

As I said before, when the "little son-in-law builder" and his "big brother" "catch eunuchs" to choose "houses, foundations, and land", the "little son-in-law builder" was the luckiest, and the ones selected were along the village trails. For this piece of land, the eldest brother was unlucky, and he picked the "home, foundation, and land" that was adjacent to him, but "retracted" by more than ten and 20 meters.

In this way, the "yard" and "floor" in front of the new house built by the "young son-in-law frame builder" are not all "exclusive" to him. The "sister-in-law" family also has to enter and exit from here. Even if there is a wall around it, it feels a bit like my brothers' "common area".It is not possible to install a gate at the gate in front of the fence.

As for the left side of the new house of the "little son-in-law shelf worker", after the fence is enclosed, it looks like there is still about 50 square meters.

Originally, the land on the left side, according to the previous "separation agreement", still has about 15 square meters, which belongs to the "sister-in-law" family.

When enclosing the "enclosed wall", the "sister-in-law" once proposed: everyone has a share in the open space on the left (but her house only occupies 15 square meters, and the "little son-in-law's shelf worker" occupies about 40 square meters) , Simply don't enclose the "wall", and use it as a "parking lot" to park in the future.

However, the large "passage" in front of the new house of the "little son-in-law who is the frame builder" is equivalent to being "confiscated" and cannot be used. The "small yard" on the "left side" of the new house feels like it can be enclosed and used.In the future, "parking" should also be exclusive to his family's "parking lot".I even want to build a "firewood house" next to my house as the "geographer" said, and the "small courtyard" on the left is also completely suitable.The "right side" of the new house is the "sister-in-law's" home.With two houses less than one meter apart, it is impossible to make room for a "firewood house" on the "right side".

Anyway, the "little son-in-law who works as a shelf worker" insisted on enclosing dozens of square meters on the "left side" of their new house.As for the 15 square meters of the "big brother and sister-in-law" family, he plans to exchange land with the "big sister-in-law" family.

If the land is not changed, the "little son-in-law builder" plans to "enclose" 15 square meters less of the "enclosed wall" on the left side, and still need to enclose the wall.

"Sister-in-law" was unwilling to accept the "land exchange" proposal at first.But the other party insisted on a "wall" on the left side, even if it didn't surround her 15 square meters, she still had to.

If it is not combined with the 40 square meters of the "little son-in-law shelf worker", the 15 square meters of the "sister-in-law" is not the "Founder" "garage" type of land, but the kind that is 10 meters long but only 1.5 meters wide. 15 square meters of thin strips.A small car has a width of about 1.7 meters. What is the use of this 1.5-meter-wide 15 square meters?Anyway, even if the "sister-in-law" wants to act as a "garage" in the future, she won't be able to get into the "car".

According to her original intention, she would definitely not be able to drive.But I have a son. Now that the boys in the countryside have grown up, how many of them don’t drive?

The "sister-in-law" is planning a "parking space" in advance for her son to "drive a car" when he grows up more than ten years later.However, the family of the "little son-in-law and builder" refused to let her "share" the dozens of square meters of land on the left, and insisted on surrounding it. It seems that they want to use it for "private use".

It's a pity that the "sister-in-law"'s house is on the "left side" of the land, which is only a 1.5-meter-long strip of land. If it is shaped like a standard 15-square-meter "garage", she will never think of talking to the "little son-in-law". The home is "shared".She herself can find someone to surround her "standard garage".

But it is too narrow to be a "garage", and the "little son-in-law's shelf worker" family refuses to "share" with her family, and it doesn't work to ask the "father-in-law" to talk to each other.It is estimated that this is also the reason why the sister-in-law is getting more and more "bad" with the "little son-in-law's shelf worker" family.

The sister-in-law had no choice but to settle for the next best thing.I thought that when my son grows up, he can afford to drive a "small car", and he can park the car on the side of the "enclosed wall" on the main passageway from the enclosure wall.Not really even a "parking position" at all.

The "sister-in-law" then relented and agreed to "change the land".But what she had her eye on was the house that her "little son-in-law, the shelf builder," now used as a kitchen.

This kitchen is located on the left side of the "old townhouse".

If counted from the front, the order of these "buildings" is as follows (from left to right): the open space on the "left" shared by the sister-in-law and the "little son-in-law's shelf worker" (intended to be enclosed as a small yard); The new house of the "scaffolder"; the new house of the "sister-in-law"'s house; the "kitchen" of the "little son-in-law's scaffolder" house; the old two-story "row house" built before... and about ten meters apart, there is Originally, the "second brother" chose the "homestead" behind the "ancestral hall".

According to this distribution of buildings, it can be seen that the "yard" enclosed on the "left side" of the new house of the "little son-in-law framer" is most useful to the "little son-in-law framer".

The single-built "kitchen" belonging to the "little son-in-law's shelf worker" is located on the "right side" of the "sister-in-law" new house. This "kitchen" is actually more useful to the "sister-in-law" family.

As for the two-story "row house" built by the plasterer "Lao Dou" in the past, the three brothers now have a share in it, and they have not really "divided" it yet.

According to the meaning of "sister-in-law", she agreed to "replace" the 15 square meters that belonged to her to the "little son-in-law shelf worker" family, which is conditional.

Specifically, she asked her "little son-in-law, the shelf builder," to use his "separate kitchen" in exchange for her 15 square meters of open space.

The "little son-in-law shelf builder" didn't measure the area of ​​the kitchen at first.I heard that the "sister-in-law" wanted to "replace" it, so I quietly took the "tape measure" to measure it and calculated it.

Good guy!Although the "kitchen" is inconspicuous, it actually covers an area of ​​more than 40 square meters.Using it to "replace" the 15 square meters of my sister-in-law's house is equivalent to "replacing" it with twice the area.

It's just that the 15 square meters of "sister-in-law"'s house is in a good location next to the "village road", so she dared to call out such a "replacement" plan.

After the "little son-in-law builder" and "the youngest daughter of the Zhou family" discussed N times secretly, they thought that there would be dozens of square meters of complete "open space" (first surrounded by a small courtyard) next to the country road. There is also a "vegetable market" or something like that, which can also be called a "street-facing" small shop.

Even if it is not so optimistic, the "vegetable market" planned by the village cannot be built without money. The open space next to the village can completely build a large iron house.Some kind of "Mahjong parlor" will be opened in the future, and it is estimated that there will be many people in the village to come to play.

In short, there are many disadvantages to having 15 square meters of land "blocked" by the "sister-in-law"'s house.There are many benefits to not having her "blocking".

Using more than 40 square meters to "replace" the long 15 square meters of the sister-in-law's house, the couple, who is the "little son-in-law's frame builder," don't think it's a "loss".If you take a longer-term view, it still feels a bit overwhelming!

His family accepted the "sister-in-law"'s condition of change.

And look at the "conversion problem" from the perspective of "sister-in-law": she wants this narrow and long "open space" of 15 square meters, which is of no use at all.If you can't build a house, you can't become a "garage".It would be different if the "kitchen" next to the "right side" of the "sister-in-law"'s new house was "replaced".This "kitchen" has more than 40 square meters.In addition, it is close to her new house, about 1.5 meters apart.If the "sister-in-law" wants to build a new house in the future, the 1.5-meter interval can be used.The depth of the house is about 12 meters, and the width of 1.5 meters can completely free up 18 square meters.Adding the "replacement" to the "little son-in-law's shelf worker"'s 42-square-meter kitchen, it means that if the "sister-in-law" wants to build a new house in the future, she will directly have a 60-square-meter "land".

And, it's not over yet.

After all, in rural areas, to build a new house, you must have at least 100 to 150 square meters of "house, foundation, and land". The new house built is considered more decent.

Just building a new house with an area of ​​60 square meters feels a bit insufficient.

But don't forget, the right side of the "kitchen" is right next to the old "row house" built by "Mason Dad".

The area of ​​the old house is about 120 square meters.

This "old row house" is divided into two rooms for you and two rooms for me.But after the "sister-in-law" had a ready-made "land" of 60 square meters, she asked the three brothers to "divide" the old houses clearly, unlike the previous method of "how many rooms each wants".

According to her opinion, even if this "old row house" is not in a hurry to be demolished in recent years, it will eventually be demolished in another ten to twenty years.Therefore, the "sister-in-law" proposed to divide the "old row house" now.Divided according to floor area. The floor area is 20 square meters. For three brothers, each family needs 120 square meters. This is fair and just.

Of course, the 40 square meters she got was next to the "kitchen".In this way, she could already "squeeze out" 60 square meters of "land", and with the 40 square meters "allocated" from the "old row house", she could directly "make up" 100 square meters.

With this 100 square meters of "land", if she wants to build a new house in more than ten or twenty years, it will be completely sufficient.

It doesn't mean how many sons the "sister-in-law" has, and it is enough to plan and build two properties for the sons.

She has a son and two daughters.The two daughters will definitely get married in the future and will not compete with their "brothers" for the family property.And the "sister-in-law" does not plan to remarry and have multiple sons.She just kept the family property.

But if he can “reserve” an additional 100 square meters of “home, foundation, and land” for his son, and when his son grows up, he will marry a wife and have children. What if he gives her two “grandchildren”?The two properties are just enough to be divided.

If she is given 3 more "grandchildren", the two real estates are not enough.

Therefore, the "sister-in-law" still has a "long-term vision".So she has to make long-term preparations in advance.

If the "little son-in-law, the builder" and the "second brother" each get only 40 square meters of the "old terrace house", they think that 40 square meters is too much, and it is not easy to build a house. "Woolen cloth.

The 100 square meters she now has is "a sure thing".If it can be "replaced" to 80 square meters more, the "land" she owns will be more generous and easier to arrange.

(End of this chapter)


Tip: You can use left, right, A and D keyboard keys to browse between chapters.